Showing posts with label walking away. Show all posts
Showing posts with label walking away. Show all posts

Friday, November 6, 2009

Why Lenders Push Homeowners Around

Why Lenders Push Homeowners Around

According to this Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis article, Government and Lender Policies of Fear and Shame Help Keep Homeowners Debt Slaves, lenders offer loan modifications to financially distressed homeowners only if doing so financially benefits the lender (i.e. it as a business decision), while homeowners view walking away from their homes as a moral decision. The article concludes that the result of these differing view points is that homeowners are at a distinct disadvantage compared to mortgage lenders when trying to make sound financial decisions regarding their homes. Without going into all the details described in the article (if you would like all the details, I highly recommend that you read it), I would like to mention the following points made in the article.
  • Homeowners heavily factor in personal responsibility and morality into their decision to keep paying their mortgages even though they are financially struggling and/or may owe more than their homes are worth (although this view is changing somewhat - see my blog post Underwater Homeowners Walking Away From Their Homes).
  • Lenders are more responsible than homeowners for the real estate boom and bust due to lenders' superior real estate market knowledge including appraisals to determine property/collateral values, complex default models, deciding to require lower down payments even though the lenders knew that higher loan to value mortgage loans had higher default rates, etc.
  • Due to lenders being more than 50% responsible for the housing bust, lenders should be willing to voluntarily write off some of the debt in order to reduce the amount that homeowners are underwater (i.e. negative equity), but they are not doing this since when lenders are trying to decide on how to best handle struggling homeowners, they do not factor in "responsibility" for the housing market crash.  Instead, lenders strictly desire an outcome that will maximize profits or minimize losses.
  • Due to the difference in the way that homeowners and lenders view mortgage loan default (personal responsibility/morality versus business decision), mortgage lenders are able to manipulate homeowners to do things that are to the financial benefit of mortgage lenders, but to the financial detriment of homeowners.
The article states "First, lenders know that borrowers with high credit scores are unlikely to default even at high levels of negative equity. To modify loans for these homeowners would be to throw money away – and to encourage more homeowners to ask for modifications. Second, a significant number of homeowners who temporarily default on their mortgages "self-cure" without any help from their lender – though self cure rates have dropped precipitously in the last two years. Again, to modify the loans of individuals who would otherwise self cure would be to throw away money. Third, homeowners with poor credit, or who end up in arrears because of “triggering events” such as unemployment, divorce, or other financially devastating circumstances are likely to default on the modified loan as well. To modify loans for these individuals is to waste time and risk housing prices falling further before the lender eventually has to foreclosure and sell the property anyway. Given these economic incentives for the lender, a seriously underwater homeowner with good credit and solid mortgage payment history who responsibly calls his lender to work out a loan modification is likely to be told by his lender that it will not discuss a loan modification until the homeowner is 30 days or more delinquent on his mortgage payment. The lender is making a bet (and a good one) that the homeowner values his credit score too much to miss a payment and will just give up the idea of a loan modification. However, if the homeowner does what the lender suggests, misses a payment, and calls back to discuss a loan modification in 30 days, the homeowner is likely to be told to call back when he is 90 days delinquent. In the meantime, the lender will send the borrower a series of strongly-worded notices reminding him of his moral obligation to pay and threatening legal action, including foreclosure and a deficiency judgment, if the homeowner does not bring his mortgage payments current. The lender is again making a bet (and again a good one) that the homeowner will be shamed or frightened into paying their mortgage. If the homeowner calls the lender’s bluff and calls back when he is 90 days delinquent, there is a good possibility that he will be told that his credit score is now so low that he does not qualify for a loan modification. Most lenders will, in other words, take full advantage of the asymmetry of norms between lender and homeowner and will use the threat of damaging the borrower’s credit score to bring the homeowner into compliance. Additionally, many lenders will only bargain when the threat of damaging the homeowner’s credit has lost its force and it becomes clear to the lender that foreclosure is imminent absent some accommodation. On a fundamental level, the asymmetry of moral norms for borrowers and market norms for lenders gives lenders an unfair advantage in negotiations related to the enforcement of contractual rights and obligations."

The information above is why:
  • Lenders take as long as they want to respond to homeowner loan modification requests.
  • Lenders frequently reject loan modification requests.
  • Financially struggling homeowners can frequently stay in their homes for many months despite not paying their mortgage loans (the lenders are frequently deciding to do nothing until foreclosure is absolutely imminent).
  • Homeowners do sometimes walk away despite the personal responsibility - they get completely frustrated with the games lenders play.
  • Walking away needs to be a viable option (albeit not the best one) for homeowners.
  • Short sales and foreclosures will continue to increase.
If you are a Middle TN homeowner, property owner, real estate investor, home builder or real estate developer who cannot pay your mortgage payments (due to losing your job, having your income reduced, illness, health problems, adverse business conditions, slow sales, loss of investment property tenants, vacancy issues, lack of funds to complete the project, feuding business partners, etc.), know that you will not be able to pay your mortgage, have defaulted on your mortgage, are already in foreclosure, or owe more than your home is worth, please contact me to discuss your options including a loan modification and a short sale (a real estate short sale occurs when the sale proceeds are not sufficient to pay off all the mortgages and liens on the property/home). I am a Middle Tennessee distressed real estate, short sale, pre-foreclosure (preforeclosure) and foreclosure REALTOR and Expert. I primarily help sellers (homeowners, property owners, real estate investors, home builders and real estate developers) of distressed real estate, short sales, pre-foreclosures, foreclosures, investment properties, failed new construction projects and struggling commercial real estate developments located in and around Middle Tennessee (Rutherford County TN, Williamson County TN, Davidson County TN, Murfreesboro TN, Smyrna TN, La Vergne TN, Eagleville TN, Lascassas TN, Rockvale TN, Christiana TN, Brentwood TN, Franklin TN, Nashville TN and Belle Meade TN).  If you do need to short sell your home or property, or you need a quick sale due to being in foreclosure, you can request short sale and foreclosure help and assistance on my website at Get Short Sale and Foreclosure Help and Assistance from a Middle Tennessee Short Sale and Foreclosure REALTOR and Real Estate Expert.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Homeowners Walking Away: Right or Wrong?

Homeowners Walking Away: Right or Wrong?

In my previous blog post, Underwater Homeowners Walking Away From Their Homes, I covered the issue of homeowners who "walk away" from their homes and mortgages (even though they can afford to pay their mortgages) due to the mortgage debt on their homes far exceeding the market value of their homes (in other words, they are "underwater"). "Walking away" is also called a "Strategic Default". That post briefly covered the fact that most homeowners view "strategic default" as being morally wrong, but despite that many homeowners would still "walk away" from their homes and mortgages if the debt to market value ratio reached a certain point. The post showed, that based on current financial research, that debt to market value ratio is somewhere around 50%. In this post I want to address the issue of whether "walking away" from a home and mortgage is Right or Wrong?

I will only state my position briefly as I would like input and comments from other people. A few years ago I would have said that "walking away" from your home and mortgage was definitely wrong. Now, I am not so sure. Real estate investors, business owners, Wall Street firms, etc. have "walked away" from debts for many, many years. If a business or investment firm cannot pay a debt, they file bankruptcy, shut down, simply do not pay, or now ask for a government bailout. Why should looking at paying debts as a business decision be OK for businesses and investment firms, but not for individuals? That is why I am no longer sure "walking away" is wrong. If buying a home is an "investment" as the National Association or REALTORS (NAR) has stated for years (they should regret that statement now) then why shouldn't a homeowner have the option to "walk away" if that so-called "investment" goes bad? After all, the mortgage lender does have contractual recourse (via the loan note and mortgage) such as reporting the lack of payment to credit reporting agencies, taking the home back via foreclosure and pursuing the delinquent homeowner for any losses not recovered by selling the foreclosed home. No where in the documents that the borrower/homeowner signed does it say that shame or moral indignation is part of that recourse. That being said, I do think that trying to sell a home via a short sale is a significantly better option for a homeowner than a "strategic default". Therefore, I would highly recommend that a homeowner try a short sale before "walking away". With that I respectfully request your comments.

If you are a homeowner in Middle Tennessee who cannot pay your mortgage (due to losing your job, having your income reduced, illness, health problems, etc.), or your home is already in foreclosure, or you owe more than your home is worth, please contact me to discuss your options including loan modifications or short sales. I am a Middle Tennessee distressed real estate, short sale, pre-foreclosure (preforeclosure) and foreclosure REALTOR and Expert. I serve real estate owners, homeowners and investment property owners in Rutherford County TN, Williamson County TN, Davidson County TN, Murfreesboro TN, Smyrna TN, La Vergne TN, Eagleville TN, Lascassas TN, Rockvale TN, Christiana TN, Brentwood TN, Franklin TN, Nashville TN and Belle Meade TN. If you do need to short sell your home (a real estate short sale occurs when the sale proceeds are not sufficient to pay off all the mortgages and liens on the property/home), or you need a quick sale due to being in foreclosure, you can request short sale and foreclosure help and assistance on my website at Get Short Sale and Foreclosure Help and Assistance from a Middle Tennessee Short Sale and Foreclosure REALTOR and Real Estate Expert.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Underwater Homeowners Walking Away From Their Homes

Underwater Homeowners Walking Away From Their Homes

According to this New York Times article, Homeowners Walking Away, a study produced by the Financial Trust Index (a financial and economic research group formed by the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and The University of Chicago Booth School of Business) states that more than 25% of foreclosures are actually strategic defaults where the homeowners walk away from their homes and mortgages even though they can afford to pay their mortgages. The Press Release, When Homeowners Walk Away: New Research Reveals More than 25 Percent of Mortgage Loan Defaults are Strategic, and Study, Moral and Social Constraints to Strategic Default on Mortgages, show that while most homeowners generally believe that walking away from a home is immoral, many will still do it if their negative home equity situation reaches a certain threshold. According to the Press Release "17 percent of households would default, even if they can afford to pay their mortgage, when the equity shortfall reaches 50 percent of the value of the house." Given that information and the fact that a Deutsche Bank report published this past summer (See my blog post on the subject - SCARY STUFF: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011) predicts that about 50% of all US mortgages will be underwater by 2011, it is highly probable that the foreclosure crisis could actually accelerate in the near future rather then settling down as several organizations have suggested. I predict that there will be record numbers of loan modifications, short sales and foreclosures over the next 3 years.

According to the Press Release "People under the age of 35 and over the age of 65 were less likely to say it was morally wrong to default compared to middle-aged respondents." I guess that younger people and older people view the strategic default decision more as a business decision than a moral one. There are in fact consequences of walking away from your home and mortgage including damaged credit, which will make it very difficult to borrow money in the future, get credit of any kind, obtain insurance (insurance companies frequently check credit as part of the insurance underwriting process) and even get a job (employers frequently check credit as part of the job application process). Another pitfall of the strategic default is that you are open to a potential deficiency judgment where the mortgage lender could pursue you for their losses not recouped by selling your foreclosed home. For these reasons, I highly recommend trying a short sale instead of a strategic default.

If you are a homeowner in Middle Tennessee who cannot pay your mortgage (due to losing your job, having your income reduced, illness, health problems, etc.), or your home is already in foreclosure, or you owe more than your home is worth, please contact me to discuss your options including loan modifications or short sales. I am a Middle Tennessee distressed real estate, short sale, pre-foreclosure (preforeclosure) and foreclosure REALTOR and Expert. I serve real estate owners, homeowners and investment property owners in Rutherford County TN, Williamson County TN, Davidson County TN, Murfreesboro TN, Smyrna TN, La Vergne TN, Eagleville TN, Lascassas TN, Rockvale TN, Christiana TN, Brentwood TN, Franklin TN, Nashville TN and Belle Meade TN. If you do need to short sell your home (a real estate short sale occurs when the sale proceeds are not sufficient to pay off all the mortgages and liens on the property/home), or you need a quick sale due to being in foreclosure, you can request short sale and foreclosure help and assistance on my website at Get Short Sale and Foreclosure Help and Assistance from a Middle Tennessee Short Sale and Foreclosure REALTOR and Real Estate Expert.