The article quotes NAHB Chairman Joe Robson, a home builder from Tulsa OK, as saying "Across the country, home builders and developers are reporting a deterioration in credit availability and intensifying pressure on borrowers with outstanding loans. Lenders are cutting off loans for viable new housing projects and producing unnecessary foreclosures and losses on AD&C loans. With the pending expiration of the $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit, these challenges threaten to halt any positive developments we have seen in the housing market in recent months. There can be no meaningful economic recovery until the flow of credit is restored to housing." (My thoughts: Since when has housing been a legitimate driver of the economy for any extended period of time? How can over priced asset prices such as housing create long term jobs?)
According to the article, the most recent NAHB survey of AD&C financing conditions, showed that some 63% of builders thought that the "availability of credit for single-family construction loans worsened in the second quarter of 2009."
The article states that home builders reporting worsening credit conditions cited the following reasons for the decline in lending:
- 80% said that lenders are lowering the allowable loan-to-value ratios.
- 76% reported that lenders are not making new loans."
- "75% stated that lenders are reducing the amount they are willing to lend"
- 62% said that lenders are requiring personal guarantees or collateral not related to the project.
The article notes that lenders, as an explanation for the reduced lending activity, have told home builders that banking regulators are forcing them to tighten lending standards. Federal regulators, on the other hand, say that they have not restricted lenders from making more loans.
The article states that the "NAHB believes that regulators and lenders should provide leeway to residential construction borrowers who have loans in good standing by providing flexibility on re-appraisals, loan modifications and perhaps forbearance on loans to give builders time to complete and sell their inventory."
I have to say that I have had enough of this nonsense. We do not need more credit to help a housing market that has imploded as a result of too much credit. I do have a serious problem with lenders due to their taking of taxpayer bailout monies and their grossly incompetent handling of short sales and foreclosures, but I do not blame them for reducing their loan activities or tightening their credit standards in the face of rising unemployment and increasing loan delinquencies. It appears that the NAHB is doing nothing but advocating something that will help home builders sell their over priced homes to naive home buyers - all at tax payer expense as these loans go bad and the federal government steps in to continue to bail out the lenders that made these loans when the financially strapped home buyers need to short sell their homes and/or fall into foreclosure.
Therefore, the answer to the blog post title question is "No" for the following 2 reasons.
- There is no actual housing recovery. Housing prices continue to fall and foreclosures continue to increase. Where is there is more than average government intervention, such as CA with their $10,000 new construction home purchase tax credit, there has a been a slight bump in prices that will only get worse when that government intervention is stopped.
- Tighter housing credit will actually the housing market in the long run due to weeding out financially unstable buyers. Long term housing market stability is the most important thing now.